The Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, wednesday, denied
allegation that he copied the research work of a United States based Nigerian Professor, Victor E. Dike and
presented it as his own ideas at a public lecture he delivered in Edo state on November 26, 2010.
Sanusi who refuted the allegation via a press
statement that was issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Wednesday insisted that he did
not write the said paper that culminated to the lawsuit currently pending
before the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court.
It will be recalled that the court presided by
Justice Adamu Bello, on Monday, summoned the CBN governor to appear on May 31
to defend himself over his alleged complicity in acts of plagiarism.
The Court equally granted the plaintiff, Prof.
Dike, who is an Adjunct Professor at the School of Engineering and Technology,
National University, Sacremento and Chief Executive Officer and Founder of
Centre for Social Justice and Human Development in California, leave to paste
the court processes at the Notice Board of the apex bank, situated within the
Central Business District, Cadastral Zone AO, of Abuja.
However, the CBN boss denied receiving the court
papers, just as he refuted allegation that his security personnel thwarted
efforts by the court bailiff to effect service on him.
The statement which was signed by the Director, Corporate
Communications at the CBN, Mr Ugochukwu A. Okoroafor, reads: “The attention of
the Central Bank of Nigeria has been drawn to reports in the media regarding a
suit against the Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, by one Victor E. Dike, who is
said to be a professor of Engineering and Technology, National University
Sacramento, USA.
“It is important to provide some clarifications on
the matter. First, as at the time of release of this statement, no court papers
in respect of the said suit, had been served on the Governor.
“Furthermore, and for the avoidance of doubt, we
wish to state categorically that Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi did not write the
said paper. Governors of the Central Bank of Nigeria, just like Chief Executive Officers of similar
institutions in Nigeria and abroad, deliver papers, not in their personal
capacities, but on behalf of the institutions for which they are chief
spokespersons.
“In the case of the CBN, such papers, even though
presented by the Governor, represent our collective views and are prepared by
professional researchers in the relevant departments of the Bank. We can vouch
that such papers are prepared in line with strict global and ethical standards.
“As a responsible public institution, we always
cooperate fully with court officers and our well trained and responsible
security officers have ever been under strict instructions to treat them with
the appropriate dignity and respect they deserve.
“While awaiting details of the alleged suit, it is
pertinent to state that speeches delivered by the current Governor, focus on
the core mandates of the Bank and are direct contributions to discourse on
national development.
“At a time like this, when the Bank is deeply
committed to critical reforms of the banking system, the least we can do is to
focus on the arduous task of bequeathing to the nation a financial system that
will effectively improve the collective welfare of the Nigerian people.”
Specifically, the plaintiff, told the high court
that he was the original author of a research wok entitled:“Review of the
challenges facing the Nigerian Economy: (Is national development possible
without technological capability?), which he said the CBN boss copied verbatim
and delivered as his paper during the eight convocation ceremony of Igbinedion
University, Okada, Edo State.
Prof Dike said he was forced to approach the high
court for redress upon discovering that the CBN governor had in six separate
occasions, plagiarized his intellectual works, just as he has asked the court
to make a declaration that the defendant is in breach of the copyrights of the
plaintiff.
As well as to grant, “a perpetual injunction
restraining the defendant from citing the two papers delivered by the defendant
on the 26th of November 2010, and 10th of December 2010
respectively as his work, having breached the Copyrights of the plaintiff
without proper reference and citation in accordance with Copyrights Acts.” Source:
Vanguard